<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoodies, a response.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/</link>
	<description>We read our blog so you don&#039;t have to.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:26:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PETE</title>
		<link>http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>PETE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Bill Belichick isn&#039;t mentioned because he doesn&#039;t deserve mentioning. The fact that Belichick wears ridiculous cut-off hooded sweatshirts falls into the category of &quot;shit everybody has a take on.&quot; Here&#039;s mine: he&#039;s a douche. See? Was that funny or interesting? I could continue and say something along the lines of &quot;it&#039;s pathetic that a [grown man; NFL head coach; three-time Super bowl winner; &amp;c.] could be mistaken for a homeless drunkard while in his gameday attire. Tom Landry would roll over in his grave, &amp;c., &amp;c. Thhouhg I do think Art Shell should&#039;ve adopted the Belichick sartorial CV last year. That would&#039;ve been great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Belichick isn&#8217;t mentioned because he doesn&#8217;t deserve mentioning. The fact that Belichick wears ridiculous cut-off hooded sweatshirts falls into the category of &#8220;shit everybody has a take on.&#8221; Here&#8217;s mine: he&#8217;s a douche. See? Was that funny or interesting? I could continue and say something along the lines of &#8220;it&#8217;s pathetic that a [grown man; NFL head coach; three-time Super bowl winner; &#038;c.] could be mistaken for a homeless drunkard while in his gameday attire. Tom Landry would roll over in his grave, &#038;c., &#038;c. Thhouhg I do think Art Shell should&#8217;ve adopted the Belichick sartorial CV last year. That would&#8217;ve been great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Cat</title>
		<link>http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Pete,

Thanks for the big ups, even if the praise is conflicting.   I hope some of my pearls of wisdom re sloots have formed the foundation of your romantic endeavors for years to come. 

I guess we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree.  I dislike hoodies because they&#039;re gay, and you like hoodies in spite of their being gay.  I think our blogs intersect in good taste from time to time, but are mostly divergent in their respective demographic.  While the Jo-Tel is the go-to blog for all things indie, I embrace my yuppi persona.  Whilst you roll around in your wardrobe of hoodies, I make sure my lettuce is well cropped,  shoes well shined, my cuff links polished, my face closely shaven, and my yuppie sled recently waxed.  That&#039;s just how I roll.  

War Little Red Riding Hood.  Out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,</p>
<p>Thanks for the big ups, even if the praise is conflicting.   I hope some of my pearls of wisdom re sloots have formed the foundation of your romantic endeavors for years to come. </p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree.  I dislike hoodies because they&#8217;re gay, and you like hoodies in spite of their being gay.  I think our blogs intersect in good taste from time to time, but are mostly divergent in their respective demographic.  While the Jo-Tel is the go-to blog for all things indie, I embrace my yuppi persona.  Whilst you roll around in your wardrobe of hoodies, I make sure my lettuce is well cropped,  shoes well shined, my cuff links polished, my face closely shaven, and my yuppie sled recently waxed.  That&#8217;s just how I roll.  </p>
<p>War Little Red Riding Hood.  Out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thrill</title>
		<link>http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Thrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 20:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Here are my thoughts: hoodies are awesome.  I&#039;m actually wearing one as I type this (plain, dark grey, natch; bought at American Apparel).  

Foudy, I&#039;m not sure what you have against them, even after reading your post on them.  Is it a childhood memory that keeps you from sporting their fresh look?  Or are you just afraid of comfort?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are my thoughts: hoodies are awesome.  I&#8217;m actually wearing one as I type this (plain, dark grey, natch; bought at American Apparel).  </p>
<p>Foudy, I&#8217;m not sure what you have against them, even after reading your post on them.  Is it a childhood memory that keeps you from sporting their fresh look?  Or are you just afraid of comfort?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETE</title>
		<link>http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>PETE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/#comment-901</guid>
		<description>Nobody? Nothing? &quot;Good post, PETE&quot; &quot;PETE! You&#039;re back, man!&quot; &quot;This is the old Jo-Tel come back home!&quot;

WELL FINE!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody? Nothing? &#8220;Good post, PETE&#8221; &#8220;PETE! You&#8217;re back, man!&#8221; &#8220;This is the old Jo-Tel come back home!&#8221;</p>
<p>WELL FINE!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Bock</title>
		<link>http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/comment-page-1/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jo-tel.com/hoodies-a-response/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>Another lengthy post, another non-mention of Bill Belichick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another lengthy post, another non-mention of Bill Belichick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
